Labor Views: Washington vs. Pillow
What is the difference between Washington's and Pillow's arguments in the excerpts?
A) Washington argues in favor of bringing Chinese immigrants into the United States, while Pillow argues in favor of a ban on allowing any Chinese immigration.
B) Washington asserts that there should be biracial cooperation on economic development, while Pillow asserts that African Americans should be excluded from the southern economy.
C) Pillow advocates against labor strikes by southern agricultural workers, while Washington advocates that African American agricultural workers should strike until immigration is halted.
D) Pillow proposes that immigrant laborers should be recruited to work in agriculture, while Washington proposes that African Americans should be recruited instead.
Answer:
Pillow proposed the recruitment of immigrant labor for agricultural work, while Washington suggested African Americans should be recruited for such work, highlighting their differing views on who should contribute to the economy. Thus, option D is correct.
In comparing the arguments presented in the context given, it seems that the most adequate answer would be D) Pillow proposes that immigrant laborers should be recruited to work in agriculture, while Washington proposes that African Americans should be recruited instead. This aligns with the evidence presented in the text, which shows the differing perspectives on the role of labor in society. Pillow, as represented in the excerpts, contends that immigrant labor, willing to work for less, should be harnessed to support economic growth. On the other hand, Washington, as indicated in the script, believed in the potential of African Americans contributing to the economy.
Washington's perspectives reflect his belief in racial cooperation on economic matters, giving dignity to labor, and providing opportunities for African Americans, a stance that is counter to Pillow's advocacy for immigrant labor.