Kelly's Constructive Alternativism: Understanding Reality Through Different Perspectives

All of the following statements about Kelly's constructive alternativism are true except one. Which statement is FALSE?

A) Kelly's constructive alternativism suggests that individuals interpret and construe events in various ways.

B) According to this theory, people's interpretations of events are based on their unique cognitive processes.

C) Constructive alternativism proposes that there is only one accurate and objective way to interpret events.

D) Kelly's theory emphasizes the idea that individuals have the capacity to generate multiple interpretations of the same event.

Answer:

The FALSE statement about Kelly's constructive alternativism is that it proposes there is only one accurate and objective way to interpret events, contradicting the theory's emphasis on individual subjective interpretations of reality.

Explanation:

The statement that is FALSE about Kelly's constructive alternativism is: Constructive alternativism proposes that there is only one accurate and objective way to interpret events. This statement is contrary to the central tenet of constructive alternativism, which emphasizes that reality is subjectively constructed by individuals through unique cognitive processes. There is not one objective interpretation of events; rather, individual interpretations can vary widely based on personal perspectives and experiences.

Within the context of constructivism, reality emerges from human cognitive constructions that are continually shaped and reshaped through social interactions. Norms and values within a society or culture develop from these shared understandings; however, they are not universally static and may change over time. For example, cultural practices on what to do when one finds a wallet demonstrate how different societies construct deviance in varying ways. What is deemed appropriate or deviant behavior can diverge significantly depending on cultural context.

← Unlock your memory potential with multisensory encoding The juror who stood firm a deep dive into juror number eight in 12 angry men →