Constitutional Convention Compromises

What were the key compromises made during the Constitutional Convention?

The participants of the Constitutional Convention had to come to a number of agreements in order for the Constitution to be accepted by all 13 states. The Virginia Plan proposed a robust national government with three branches—legislative, executive, and judicial. On the other hand, the New Jersey Plan aimed to protect the interests of smaller states by giving each state equal representation in Congress. The Commerce and Slave Trade Compromise addressed the issue of the slave trade, prohibiting the importation of newly captured Africans after 1808. These compromises were crucial in forming the foundation of the United States Constitution.

Virginia Plan

The Virginia Plan was supported by larger states that advocated for strong state governments. It proposed a bicameral legislature where representation was based on population size and taxes paid. This plan laid the groundwork for the structure of the national government.

New Jersey Plan

The New Jersey Plan, put forward by William Paterson, suggested a unicameral Congress similar to that under the Articles of Confederation. It aimed to ensure that smaller states had an equal voice in Congress by granting each state one vote. This plan provided a balance of power between the larger and smaller states.

Commerce and Slave Trade Compromise

The Commerce and Slave Trade Compromise was an agreement that prohibited Congress from interfering with the slave trade for 20 years. It also addressed issues related to commerce and trade between the states. This compromise reflected the delicate balance between states' rights and federal authority. In conclusion, the Constitutional Convention compromises were essential in shaping the structure and principles of the United States Constitution. The debates and agreements made during the convention laid the foundation for the federal system of government and the protection of individual rights.
← Driving left of center risk of head on collisions Reflecting on the advancements in archery crossbows vs conventional bows →